![]() ![]() Skyline currently has a Zacks Rank of #2 (Buy). It's also important to note that Style Scores work as a complement to the Zacks Rank, our stock rating system that has an impressive track record of outperformance. We also talk about price change and earnings estimate revisions, two of the main aspects of the Momentum Style Score. ![]() Or the photo will look fake (and amateurishly so).Below, we take a look at Skyline (SKY), a company that currently holds a Momentum Style Score of A. There is an adjusment in Luminar to blur the sky to make it look appropriately out of focus it does not look like that was applied.Īs I said earlier, editing photos for this purpose requires care, skill, and attention to details. One reason the sky replacement is a distraction is that the focus on the sky is still sharp. ( show quote)Īnd now you have a wierd glow/halo around the bird. I took the liberty of working on your original image in DXO PhotoLab to highlight the bird rather than the background and didn't change the sky except to pull out more of the detail that was already there.Its a neat trick the way they replace the skies an. I find those busy skies a distraction from the subject of your images. I took the liberty of working on your original image in DXO PhotoLab to highlight the bird rather than the background and didn't change the sky except to pull out more of the detail that was already there. There are a whole lot of missing features as well, and local adjustments seem to be inefficiently implemented. I wanted to love it after all the hype I've been reading, but I think its best used by those not interested in dealing with the complexities and learning curve of pro level post processing solutions. I've been playing around with the trial of Luminar 4 and so far I'm not that impressed. ![]() ![]() However, even if a chunk of the bird's head had not gone missing in the first image, the replacements skies look out of place and artificial on those images. Its a neat trick the way they replace the skies and alter the overall lighting of the whole image to more or less match the sky. I have Luminar 4, it can do some fun stuff. In many cases, you need to bring the original and Luminar product together in a real editor and work out the differences. Luminar is not very good at that, but it can be done with a lot of work.ĥ. Edge effects need to be scanned for, and fixed with detailed masking/editing. You need to use sky shots that have the sun in the same position.Ĥ. The disparate direction of light and shadow cannot be fixed. The program does try to adjust image color to match the changes in color of the replacement, but it doesn't do a good job as you get further away from the boundary.ģ. Pretty soon, all your photos are going to look alike, and like everyone elses photos.Ģ. They have a limited number of sky photos to use for replacement. This is the list of reasons not to use this in general:ġ. IN PARTICULAR: Just look at the top of the head of the bird. Publishing these photos is a clear indication of this. You should not be using this program, because you don't have the editing techniques to use it or the attention to detail to avoid letting it's mistakes get through. I am using a iMac and have had no problems with the software. Here are a couple of pictures that I played with the Sky replacement feature. So far I am very impressed with the update from Luminar 3. I have been playing with Luminar 4 for a few days. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |